Michael wholeheartedly supports the fight for a greatly improved rail service, and is working together with local Councillors to ensure residents’ voices are heard.
On 6 December 2017, Michael met Andy Mellors, Chief Executive of South Western Railway (SWR), together with Cllr Charlotte Morley and Cllr Mike Goodman. They discussed SWR’s new timetable proposals, and expressed to Mr Mellors the concerns that constituents raised, such as the cessation of direct services to and from London Waterloo.
Michael then wrote to Mr Mellors on 14 December 2017 to outline the pertinent points that many constituents have made to him. Mr Mellors' reply is attached below.
Michael also wrote to the Rail Minister to ask him to do everything possible to help SWR preserve the vital direct connection to and from London Waterloo for his constituents and local businesses. The Rail Minister's reply is attached below.
SWR’s new timetable proposals also included faster journey times from Bagshot, Camberley and Frimley to Waterloo, which would be achieved by reducing connection times at Ash Vale.
In April 2019, following the Consultation, SWR reported that it decided to retain the direct peak services between Waterloo and Camberley, and would add an extra evening peak return service.
The new timetable was due to be introduced in December 2018, but was delayed until May 2019. Disappointingly, the proposed faster journey times were not implemented that May, and the existing timetable was largely rolled over.
More recently, Michael met Surrey County Council on 20 September 2019 to discuss securing improvements to the rail service, and wrote to the Transport Secretary and to Network Rail.
Attached below, is the response of 24 October from Network Rail, which explains further why the improvements proposed by SWR have not yet materialised.
In January 2020, Michael met the new Managing Director of SWR, Mark Hopwood, and also met the Chief Executive of Network Rail, Andrew Haines, in February, to press for a better service.
|Response from South Western Railway.pdf||213.41 KB|
|Response from the Rail Minister.pdf||198.95 KB|
|Response from Network Rail||324.96 KB|